Anderson residents will have to wait to find out the fate of their fire chief. Members of the Anderson Fire Protection District board came out of closed session Thursday night and cryptically announced that they "gave our attorney direction."
Board chairman Keith Webster did not comment on whether the board made a decision regarding the employment of Anderson Fire Protection District Chief Joe Piccinini, who has been on paid leave since an investigation began May 12, or if the board had completed its review of the probe.
No new special meetings were scheduled by the board, Webster said.
The investigation of Piccinini sat in large white binders, several inches thick, in front of the district board Thursday night. The oard adjourned from their closed session an hour later at 8:15 p.m. That's when Webster announced the board "gave our attorney direction."
Webster did not comment whether the board made a decision regarding Piccinini's employment or if the board had completed its review of the investigation.
Piccinini, who was not present at the meeting in open session, said he had not yet heard from the district's attorney and made no comment on the proceedings during a phone call at about 9 p.m.
Piccinini's attorney reiterated the chief's preference that "all confidential discussions pertaining to this matter must and should remain in closed session as we have previously discussed," according to the district's attorney Mike Fitzpatrick.
No new special meetings were scheduled by the board, Webster said.
In contrast to the well-attended June 11 district board meeting, only about 15 people who were not firefighters attended the June 25 meeting — and none of whom addressed the board during open session.
Only district captain Jason Bellinger spoke, countering comments made on www.andersonvalleypost.com that discussed the fire district board and the investigation of Piccinini. The media, he said, portrayed the district board members and employees as corrupt. As he spoke, all firefighters in the audience stood with him.
"When we, your firefighters need help . . . who can we call?" Bellinger read from a prepared statement. "It was unanimously decided to acquire the help of our fire board in regards to numerous situations of concern that were terribly affecting morale, liability, and the harmony of our work place. At no time has any of the fire district members been bribed, coerced, or threatened by our fire board into any testimonies given during this investigation. Please remember, we went to them for help. . . .
"I present the community and the Anderson Fire Protection District board of directors a majority ‘vote of no confidence' of Mr. Piccinini," Bellinger said, adding that of the district's 28 members, 23 voted no confidence, three abstained and two were unable to contact. " . . . Votes were voluntarily cast by the members own free will and without coercion."
In open session, the board voted unanimously to, as board chairman Keith Webster read, "invite the Grand Jury to look into (the district's) activities, not because of any identified irregularities but to demonstrate its openness to public scrutiny and to improve District policies and procedures if the Grand Jury makes recommendations for changes."
"The sooner the better," board member Butch Schaefer said.
Responding to Valley Post inquiry as to whether the district board gave proper notice of tonight's meeting regarding to the Board's Grand Jury investigation considerations, Fitzpatrick said that the Brown Act requires only 24 hours of advance notice under section 54956.
"The Brown Act permits legislative bodies of local agencies to hold ‘special meetings' on 24 hours' notice, provided certain steps are taken," according to Katherine Keating of Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, general counsel for the California First Amendment Coalition.











Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 8
southcounty1 writes:
It's time to take the gloves off. The horrible, deplorable, vile actions of that small group of malcontents who supported the ousted fire chief must be called to task.
They have become strangely silent, probably because of the incredible investigation done by Chief Purcell and the foot-high investigative report.Be careful of what you wish for, vile people. It's coming back. The board has turned the situation and itself over to the Grand Jury. So, much of this disgusting stuff about the former fire chief WILL come out.In addition, the actions of others in the community also will be revealed.
What about Regency place and its den of deceit? Lassen View Reality and its agents. The chamber? The newspaper?
Phone baloney letters to the board manufactured by a small group. Hopkins?
We understand there may be a lawsuit filed in response to this group's horrible, unChristianlike tactics.
Stay tuned, folks!
andersonsnooper360 writes:
Someone forgot to take their lithium.
ForAnderson writes:
Hmmnnnn...to quote you, SouthCounty1,"So, much of this disgusting stuff about the former fire chief WILL come out. In addition, the actions of others in the community also will be revealed."
Unless you are part of the fire board, how do you know there is "disgusting stuff" about the Chief, and why do you say he is the "former fire chief"? Must be a leaky mouth or mouths somewhere in our community! Interesting how "closed sessions" do not stay closed.
You and your friends should take your medication regularly. We will all be better off.
You sound like a blow-hard trying to bluff people. Scare tactics-I am shaking in my boots, just so you know.
BlueSuedeShoes writes:
I'm shaking so hard my blue suede shoes fell off....I hate it when that happens.
AndersonMom writes:
Might want to be careful there, Southcounty1, when you remove your gloves you leave fingerprints that can permanently attach you to your actions.
As for strangely silent, hmm....I'm sorry, I didn't realize that my presence here was so desired by you and your friends. I've taken a few days to spend time with my children during their summer break. If I'd realized you would be going into such hate-filled withdrawals by my absence, I would have kept a computer close by and gotten online when the kids were asleep.
As for threatening a lawsuit, I doubt there is anything written in these comments or in the letters submitted that isn't covered by the Freedom of Speech. Of course, people that usually yell "I'm gonna sue" seem to be those, in my opinion, who either watch way too many of those 30 minute court shows on TV or are so desperate to get the spotlight off of them that they'll try anything.
As for trying to create problems for local business people by your list above, only one thing stuck out to me. Are you all really so scared by a group of Senior Citizens that you list them here? Better hope nobody tries anything over there. If my parents or grandparents lived there and succumbed to any sort of violence after your post, it is I who would be hiring a lawyer and discussing you inciting such a thing. That is an arrestable offense I believe. ;-)
andersonlegend writes:
haha southcounty1 you brighten my day just that much more about that group. Hopkins is sure making a name for herself. She has know idea what an infamous reputation it is either. To blind to realized the truth. Come on really? I promise all you need to do is take one step back without two steps forward right after it.
HeardEnough writes:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-81...
good reading on first amendment rights. read page 14 regarding defamamation and libel. your rights don't extend as far as you might believe. your anonominity is not protected by the journalist shield either, nor is it protected in stating falsehoods about a public figure. me? i'll sit back and watch the fur fly.
southcounty1 writes:
If I was part of the hate campaign...the unChristian campaign...I would be worried right now. It's all going to come out. You can't disguise yourselves anymore. your businesses, your non-profits will be very affected. Get ready. Get on your blue swede shoes(the ones with the brown stuff on the soles)....
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.