Report paints a sordid picture of former fire chief

The allegations brought against former Anderson Fire Chief Joe Piccinini by members of his own department have finally been made public, thanks in no small part to a lawsuit brought by the Record Searchlight under the California Public Records Act.

Shasta County Superior Court Judge Monica Marlow also deserves a round of applause for upholding the public's right to know and ordering the release of that report, which the Anderson Fire Protection District's board of directors had been advised to keep confidential by their attorney Michael Fitzpatrick.

The Record Searchlight has posted on-line a 41-page executive summary or "Report of the Internal Administrative Investigation" conducted by Neil J. Purcell, Jr., formerly Anderson's police chief, now retired and living in Big Sky, Mont.

Members of the public who desire the other 900-plus pages of interview transcripts can, for $5, purchase a CD from the Anderson Fire Protection District with Purcell's entire report, a report that ultimately cost the district's rate-payers more than $41,000 not including the newspaper's attorney fees, should they be awarded.

As detailed on page A-1 of this newspaper and on our Web site, initial reviews of the 41-page summary report and the interview transcripts paint a sordid picture of the internal operations of Anderson's fire department where a Fire Chief was apparently able to get embarrassingly drunk in uniform, berated or sexually harassed his male and female subordinates, regularly sprinkled his speech with profanities and used district property for personal use including viewing pornographic Web sites on his work computers.

Throughout his 10.5-hour interview by Purcell, Piccinini repeatedly proclaimed his own innocence and denied most of the allegations, proclaiming that things were just done differently in Tulsa, Okla., where he had worked previously.

If the allegations contained in Purcell's internal investigation are found to be true - and based on Mr. Purcell's track record with the Anderson and Laguna Beach police departments I am confident they will prove to be so - then since October of 2007, when Piccinini was hired as Fire Chief to supervise 28 paid or volunteer fire fighting personnel, life at the Anderson Fire Protection District would have been pure hell.

A sexually-charged atmosphere where foul language, abusive behavior, questionable ethics and heavy drinking were not only tolerated but exhibited by the fire chief on a regular basis is no place I would feel comfortable working, nor would I want my 21-year-old son or my 19-year-old daughter around such people regardless of what the job paid either monetarily or in public recognition.

However, since Piccinini was granted immunity by Purcell prior to his interview, there is some debate as to whether any information gathered in the report can ever be used in any criminal proceedings against the former chief, who resigned July 1 to find a job with another fire agency in another California town.

© 2010 Anderson Valley Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 1

HeardEnough writes:

Dear Mr. Winship,
It's good to see after reading the report that you NOW understand the depth of this man's behavior. It wasn't about Comnick wanting favors. It wasn't about getting rid of him to open the job for Nichols. I recall your editorial at the time taking three council persons to task over his potential firing. I also recall what I felt was bias reporting in favor of the "concerned citizens" group. Because of your stand, you have lost credability and respect from many in the Anderson community. Why was this anonymous group given so much print? How about some coverage on this group now that the report is public? Why did they fight so hard to save this obnoxious creep's job? Many of us in the community know who they are. Do the community a favor and expose them.

Comnick was accused of punishing the chief for not favoring a friend's project. Shaeffer was accused of insinuating that one of the concerned citizens was hooking at the Handy Spot.
Webster was accused of illegal acts. The firemen were accused of wanting to get rid of him over a proposed conditioning program. Nichols was accused of wanting his job. Lots of accusations you printed with no merit. Fair reporting? I think not. You have some fences to mend. I suggest you start with the fire department.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features